REAL PAST LIFE STORY
Why Did Her Mother Reject Her? A Past Life Regression Story of Family Bonds and Forgiveness
By Hitesh Chhabra • Past Life Regression Expert & Psychologist
18 min read • October 2026
The Affection She Kept Hoping to Receive
A child does not begin by asking whether a parent deserves her love. She usually begins by reaching for that parent. A little approval, a kind word, the feeling of being welcome at home: these can become such ordinary expectations that we forget what it means to grow up without them.
The woman in this past life regression story came with a question that had followed her from childhood into adult life. Why did her mother seem so angry with her? Why did attempts to come closer so often end in another wound?
As she told her story, the question widened. It involved education, marriage, her father’s death, property and the younger brother who received the affection she had wanted. These were her reported experiences and perceptions. Listening carefully meant allowing each part to be heard without turning the account into a judgment against identifiable relatives.
Only after understanding the present-life sequence did we begin to explore the regression. The answer she experienced did not come from one scene. It required two lives and a return to something that had initially remained hidden.
Two Children, Very Different Rules
She was the elder child. Her younger brother was born about five or six years later. According to her account, the difference in how they were treated was visible from early childhood.
By roughly seven or eight, she was expected to manage much of her own washing, food and everyday care. Her mother’s attention, she felt, belonged to the boy. She described harsh remarks about being a daughter, including words that made her feel her very birth was unwelcome.
Her father was affectionate, but she experienced him as unable to oppose her mother’s controlling manner. Love was present in the household, yet it did not reliably become protection when she needed it.
Imagine what that can mean to a child. The difficulty is not merely that one sibling receives something extra. The child begins to wonder whether her own needs are unreasonable. Even a small kindness can then carry a much larger hope: perhaps this time I will be accepted too.
A Medical Dream That Had to Be Put Aside
She wanted to study medicine. During the school years that shaped this ambition, she said household work and conflict repeatedly interfered with her studies. During an important examination period, she was made to leave home.
Her aunt and uncle gave her a place to stay. She continued studying and did well. But the support needed to pursue her medical ambition did not follow. She described being directed away from the science and medical route and eventually choosing Arts. After relinquishing that plan, she returned home.
The narration is not consistent about the exact class and sequence of the Science-to-Arts change. The important source-supported point is the interrupted medical ambition, the examination-period displacement and the relatives who helped her. We do not need to invent a tidy school timeline to understand that loss.
For a young person, abandoning a course can mean more than changing subjects. It can mean putting away an image of the person she had hoped to become.
Seven Months in the Home That Would Become Her In-Laws’
When marriage proposals began, she felt that her mother repeatedly obstructed them. Eventually she met a man she wished to marry and decided to stand by that choice. Another serious conflict followed. She was again made to leave the family home, and she said relatives were warned not to shelter her.
This time, the prospective in-laws opened their door. They gave her a separate room and a place to stay. She remained with them for about seven months.
They were willing to support her, but wanted the marriage to take place with her parents’ consent. Eventually, as the situation became known and social pressure grew, the parents agreed. The marriage was completed with a modest ceremony.
The household she entered through that marriage proved supportive. Her husband and his family treated her with affection. That did not erase the childhood wound, but it gave her an experience of family in which she could feel welcomed.
Why She Kept Going Back
Her husband encouraged her to restore contact with her parents. From his position, a family reconciliation seemed worth trying. She too still wanted her mother’s affection, and visits resumed.
Yet she reported that the old taunts returned. She also felt that her mother’s conduct threatened the peace of her marriage. The wish to reconnect and the experience of being hurt remained side by side.
It is easy to ask, from outside, why someone returns after repeated disappointment. The person returning may not be expecting a perfect relationship. She may be hoping for one ordinary moment: a mother pleased to see her, a conversation without an accusation, a place at home that does not have to be earned again.
That longing helps us understand the next turn in the story. It does not make every later decision safe, but it explains why a change of tone could matter so much to her.
Her Father’s Death Became Another Accusation
On one occasion, her mother and brother were away at a function. She stayed to look after her father and the house. He went out for his usual walk and died after a heart attack, according to the narration.
Instead of sharing the loss with her daughter, the mother was said to have blamed her and questioned her motives concerning property. The video states that the postmortem indicated a natural death. It does not provide the medical report itself, and the accusation must not be repeated as an established fact.
For the daughter, grief now came with the pain of being suspected by her own family. Contact broke down again.
The father she had experienced as loving was gone. The relationship with her mother had become even harder to approach. Yet the desire for a different relationship had not disappeared.
The Call She Had Wanted for Years
Months later, her mother called. This time, the daughter heard affection and an apology. The mother attributed the earlier words to grief and distress after losing her husband.
The daughter wanted to believe that something had changed. They began meeting again. For a person who had waited so long for warmth, the warmth itself could feel like an answer.
During this period, her mother was concerned about establishing an income for the younger son. The daughter described him as using intoxicants and spending money irresponsibly. Those descriptions are part of her account, not an independent assessment of him.
The family came to hold neighbouring plots, one associated with the mother and brother and another belonging to the daughter. A plan to build a hotel for the brother then brought those two plots into the same conversation.
A Plot, a Promise, and an Affidavit
Her mother proposed that the hotel would work better on the combined land. She asked the daughter to transfer her plot for the brother’s project, promising that another plot would be provided in return. The daughter agreed and completed the transfer within weeks.
A further request followed. Her mother wanted an affidavit relinquishing the daughter’s claim in the parental house. The explanation was that the house carried emotional meaning and should not later become a source of dispute between the siblings. Separate compensation was promised.
The daughter signed. In her mind, she was helping a family with whom she had finally begun to feel close again.
Later, she received a replacement plot of similar size, but said its location made it less valuable. The separate compensation she expected for her interest in the family home did not arrive as promised. When she raised the issue, she said the earlier harshness returned. She was told that what she had received was all she would get.
She came to feel that the six or eight months of affection had served a purpose. More than the financial loss, it was the possibility that the warmth had not been sincere that hurt her. This account does not establish the legal effect of any document or resolve a property dispute.
Past Life Regression Opened in a Yellow-Walled Haveli
In the first regression scene, she perceived a large room with bright yellow walls and a red carpet. A painted portrait hung there. Looking at it, and then at herself, she experienced herself as a man of about thirty-five to forty.
He wore a white dhoti and kurta, an impressive turban, a silver bracelet and fine shoes. The surroundings might initially suggest royalty, but he was not a king. He was a prosperous dairy merchant in Gujarat, with a large haveli and thousands of cattle.
He had a wife and a son of about seven or eight. Several people worked in the household. When he called them, they came with respect rather than obvious fear.
At first, this appeared to be a story about a man who treated those around him generously. But the first impression was incomplete.
The People He Had Helped Were Familiar
The merchant described helping his workers when they faced difficulties. His support went beyond the wages they earned. Within the regression, the client began recognizing these people.
The aunt and uncle who had sheltered her during her school difficulties appeared among them. So did her present father and members of the husband’s family who had helped her during the marriage crisis.
For her, those recognitions brought a sense of continuity to the support she had received. In the session’s spiritual interpretation, kindness given in one setting seemed to return through another.
But a person’s generosity in one relationship does not tell us everything about that person’s conduct in another. The next scene brought us inside the merchant’s marriage.
His Wife Asked to Visit Her Parents
The wife wished to go to her parental home. The merchant reacted by slapping her and refusing. He described himself as strict. Initially, the extent of the behaviour was not fully acknowledged.
That small word, “strict”, can conceal a large difference. There is a difference between a household having responsibilities and one person being denied a voice in her own life. Here, a simple wish to visit her parents brought a violent response.
At this stage, the client did not recognize the wife or son as present-life relatives. We had found familiar supportive people, but the original question about her mother and brother remained unresolved.
The session moved toward another life. Later, we would have to return to this room and see what the first account had left out.
Another Life, a Modest Home, and a Happy Family
In the next experience, she saw herself as a woman of about twenty-five or twenty-six, cutting grass near fields. Her household was not as wealthy as the merchant’s, but she felt content in it.
There was a loving husband and two children, a boy of about eight and a girl of about six. She recognized the husband as her husband in the present life. She recognized the boy as her elder maternal aunt. No clear present-life identification was given for the girl.
A wealthier neighbouring woman did not share in this happiness. Within the scene, the client perceived resentment and jealousy from that neighbour, who had no children.
The neighbour’s childlessness is a detail of the narrated experience, not an explanation of anyone’s character. The conflict that followed belongs to this particular story. It should not become a judgment about people who do not have children.
The Quarrel Over Stones Outside the House
The neighbour accused the little boy of putting stones outside her home and threatened to punish him. The client described usually avoiding conflict, but on this occasion she confronted the woman.
In her anger, she also spoke cruelly about the neighbour’s inability to have children. It was a hurtful response to an already hostile encounter. The neighbour’s husband came outside during the argument.
Then two recognitions emerged. The neighbour was perceived as her present mother. The neighbour’s husband was perceived as her present brother.
She sent her children to play elsewhere. The confrontation ended outwardly, but she experienced the neighbour’s resentment as continuing. The scene had given her the familiar faces she had been seeking, though it had not yet explained the full pattern.
A Night in the Courtyard
A later scene showed her sleeping on a cot in the courtyard. Someone entered over the wall and attacked her in her sleep. In the experience, she died from suffocation.
After perceiving herself outside the body, she recognized the attacker as the neighbouring woman. The people around her believed the death had been natural. Within the story she was experiencing, they did not discover what had happened.
This was a regression scene, not a verified crime or evidence against anyone in the present. It also raised another question within the session. If the neighbour’s anger had already led to her death in that life, why did she experience the same relationship as so hostile now?
The question brought the exploration toward spiritual guidance. The response did not add a third life. It returned to the first one.
The Haveli Held a Much Longer Story
With the guidance she perceived, the client revisited the wealthy merchant’s household. What had initially appeared as one slap and a strict temperament opened into a much longer account of control and cruelty.
The wife had lived without freedom to make ordinary choices or express herself. The haveli’s comfort had not given her peace. A large house can still feel like confinement when a person inside it has no room to speak.
The merchant lived to approximately eighty-five or ninety. At his deathbed, his wife sat nearby, carrying resentment rather than the grief he might have expected. The narration describes roughly sixty-five years of a painful marriage.
Now the identities became clear within the experience. The wife was recognized as the present mother. The son was recognized as the present brother. The son had been too afraid of his father to oppose him; the client connected that earlier silence with the lack of support she felt from her brother now.
Why Retaliation Had Not Ended the Relationship
The spiritual interpretation linked the lives in sequence: the merchant’s household, then the neighbouring families, then the present relationship of mother and daughter.
The guide’s explanation contrasted a long marriage of suffering with the brief act that ended the later life. The narration uses this to describe resentment that remained unsatisfied despite retaliation. It is an interpretation within the session, not a measurable system of karmic punishment.
The human question is still powerful. Does hurting someone finally settle our own hurt? Or can retaliation keep the relationship alive inside us, even after the outward event has ended?
None of this makes the daughter’s present suffering deserved. Nor does it excuse the merchant’s cruelty or the neighbour’s violence within the story. The exploration turned toward a different way of ending the bond.
The Guidance Was Forgiveness With Distance
The ending is important. She was not advised to keep returning and trying to repair the relationship with her mother and brother. The guidance she experienced was to forgive inwardly while maintaining distance.
She was encouraged to send goodwill through meditation and spiritual practice, and to work toward releasing the bond within herself. The direction was away from repeated confrontation and renewed attempts to obtain affection from the same painful pattern.
Forgiveness here did not mean calling everything acceptable. It did not mean returning property, signing another paper or pretending trust had been restored. It concerned the anger she carried and the way she wished to live with it.
The video does not report a later reconciliation, recovered property or changed behaviour from the relatives. Its closing point is the guidance itself: a person may seek peace without returning to the place where the same injury keeps reopening.
A Kind Reputation Does Not Answer for the Whole Person
The merchant’s life leaves another reflection. He could be generous to workers while being oppressive toward his wife. The gratitude of people outside the marriage did not cancel what happened inside it.
Think of an ordinary example. Someone is patient with customers, helpful to neighbours and admired among friends, but humiliates a family member whenever a door closes. The public kindness may be real. The private harm is real too. One does not erase the other.
This example is a reflection, not another scene from the client’s account. It asks us to look where our own conduct is easiest to overlook. How do we speak to people who depend on us? Do we confuse their silence with agreement? Do we expect praise for kindness in one place while refusing accountability in another?
The story began with a daughter asking why she was rejected. It ended by widening the question to the use of power, the longing for affection and the possibility of stepping out of a relationship’s repeated pain.
What Forgiveness Can Leave Intact
For me, the most useful reflection is that forgiveness need not erase discernment. We can wish someone well without giving that person the same access to our decisions, money or emotional life.
An inward practice and an outward boundary can exist together. The first addresses what we carry. The second addresses what we allow to happen again.
This past life regression story does not offer a formula for every difficult family. It describes one woman’s search and the guidance she experienced. Its ending invites a careful question: if I no longer need to keep the anger alive, must I also keep returning to the same hurt?
A Note About This Account
This article follows the original Vighnahartaa video narrated by Hitesh Chhabra. Present-life events and allegations reflect the client’s reported account. Earlier-life scenes, relationship recognitions and spiritual guidance are subjective regression experiences, not independently verified history or evidence against present relatives.
The illustrations are symbolic. No later family reconciliation, financial recovery or guaranteed healing outcome is reported. The school chronology is kept broad where the narration is inconsistent, and the article does not determine the legal effect of the property documents.
Past Life Regression Expert
& Psychologist
Helping people explore recurring emotional, relationship & life patterns through Past Life Regression, healing and spiritual guidance.
Reflect, Understand & Take It Forward
Tap each question to reveal a deeper perspective from this story and its wider life lessons.
Why did the daughter seek past life regression?
She wanted to understand the hostility she experienced from her mother and brother across childhood, education, marriage and later property dealings.
Who supported her in the present-life account?
She described help from her aunt and uncle during her studies, affection from her father, and important support from her husband and his family during and after the marriage difficulties.
What did the property episode involve?
She reported transferring a plot for her brother’s hotel project and signing an affidavit concerning the parental home, relying on promises of replacement land and separate compensation. This is her account, not a legal finding.
Who was she in the first regression life?
She experienced herself as a wealthy dairy merchant in Gujarat, generous toward workers but controlling and cruel within his marriage.
Why did the session return to that first life?
The wife and son were not initially recognized. A later return revealed the long marriage and their perceived connection with her present mother and brother.
What happened in the neighbouring-family life?
She experienced a happy rural household, a conflict with a neighbour and a fatal nighttime attack. She recognized that neighbour as her present mother within the regression.
What do the sixty-five years refer to?
The narration describes about sixty-five years of painful married life for the merchant’s wife. The merchant’s age at death is given separately as approximately eighty-five to ninety.
Was she advised to reconcile with her mother and brother?
No. The specific guidance was inward forgiveness, goodwill through meditation and maintaining distance, rather than attempting to rebuild those relationships.
Does forgiveness require renewed trust?
No. The story’s closing reflection allows forgiveness and boundaries to coexist. Trust and access need not be restored merely because someone chooses to release resentment.
Did the video report recovered property or a changed family?
No such follow-up outcome is given. The account closes with the spiritual guidance experienced during the session.
Continue Your Journey
Need Personal Guidance?
Explore one-to-one Past Life Regression, healing and consultation sessions with the Vighnahartaa team.
Want to Learn Meditation?
Learn meditation free of cost and receive spiritual guidance to develop greater peace, inner strength and a deeper connection with God.
Past Life Regression Expert & Psychologist
We help people explore recurring emotional, relationship and life patterns through Past Life Regression, healing and spiritual guidance.
You May Also Like
Watch the Original Past Life Story
Prefer listening to the story? Watch the original past life regression narration by Hitesh Chhabra below.